Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Tillman v. Amherst Police Department et al
as 6:2023cv06439
Plaintiff:
Samuel Tillman
Defendant:
Amherst Police Department, Det. Lt. Theodore DiNoto, Det. Sean Bailey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ruggiero v. Rogers et al
as 1:2023cv00229
Plaintiff:
Anthony Ruggiero
Defendant:
Donald D. Rogers, Mark E. Carrow, Joseph H. Noeth and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rodriguez v. Williams et al
as 1:2022cv01020
Plaintiff:
Victor Rodriguez
Defendant:
M.D. David D. Williams, Concetta M. Partrige and Kay G. Arnold
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sommers v. Williams et al
as 1:2022cv00627
Plaintiff:
Neal D. Sommers
Defendant:
Dr. Williams, K. Milligan, E. Drankhan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Boyd v. Gille et al
as 1:2022cv00596
Plaintiff:
Raymond Boyd
Defendant:
P. Gille, K. Arnold, Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Diaz v. M. et al
as 6:2019cv06906
Defendant:
Dr. John Morley, Naiomi M., Ms. Arnold and others
Plaintiff:
Miguel Diaz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Constant et al v. United States Department of Homeland Security et al
as 1:2019cv01044
Petitioner:
Gary Freemont, Thomas Marvens, Pierre Rameck and others
Respondent:
Honorable Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen, United States Department of Homeland Security, Jeffrey J. Searls and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Nooner v. Miller et al
as 6:2019cv06116
Respondent:
Judge J. Leon Holmes, Judge Kristine G. Baker, Judge James M. Moody, Jr. and others
Petitioner:
Terrick Nooner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Barnes v. Crowley et al
as 1:2018cv00278
Plaintiff:
Eben Barnes
Defendant:
Karen Crowley and Arnold
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Betts v. Koenigsman et al
as 1:2017cv00073
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Betts
Defendant:
Carl J. Koenigsman, Wayne Ortiz and Kay Arnold
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
