Cases 1 - 10 of 12
RW DBA RHM v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified in Schedule A
as 1:2024cv01289
Plaintiff:
RW DBA RHM
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified in Schedule A, Shenzhen Wenchuangfu Electronic Plastic Product Co., Ltd., Changzhou Henry Import And Export Co., Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
BBC Studios Distribution Ltd v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
as 1:2024cv00818
Plaintiff:
BBC Studios Distribution Ltd
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, Dongguan Hongsha Garment Co., Limited, Guangzhou Funtoys Co., Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv07665
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Bestway Inflatables & Material Corp. v. The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto
as 1:2023cv05650
Defendant:
MengHuan-US, The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto, Xin Xiang City Meng Huang Trading Co., Ltd and others
Plaintiff:
Bestway Inflatables & Material Corp.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44 Trademark Infringement
Crayola Properties, Inc. v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
as 1:2023cv04349
Plaintiff:
Crayola Properties, Inc.
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, Baoding Xiaodan Cultural Goods Co., Ltd., Nanjing Seeking Culture Appliance Co and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Deckers Outdoor Corporation v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
as 1:2023cv03635
Plaintiff:
Deckers Outdoor Corporation
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, ABQP PET Store, Bogaza and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Pet-Ag, Inc. v. ICROKUS Inc et al
as 1:2023cv02297
Defendant:
Andrii Dorosh, ICROKUS Inc a New York corporation doing business as Biz Pet doing business as Promaster Pet Store, Andrew Dorosh and others
Plaintiff:
Pet-Ag, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Zuru (Singapore) PTE., Ltd. et al v. The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto
as 1:2022cv05229
Plaintiff:
Zuru (Singapore) PTE., Ltd. and ZURU Inc.
Defendant:
The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto, NurKar Retail (220), Shop910367226 Store (57) and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Zippo Manufacturing Company v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
as 1:2022cv03126
Plaintiff:
Zippo Manufacturing Company
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, Baoji Bojie Metal Materials Co., Ltd., Hangzhou Longwin Industry Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
ToLife Technologies Pty Ltd et al v. The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A to the Complaint
as 1:2022cv02749
Plaintiff:
ToLife Technologies Pty Ltd and Moshe Maor
Defendant:
The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A to the Complaint, globebestdeal, homefromgoods and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
