Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Garcia v. Beech-Nut Nutrition Company et al
as 2:2024cv00580
Plaintiff:
Ashely Garcia
Defendant:
Beech-Nut Nutrition Company and Gerber Products Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Sternberg v. Warneck et al
as 2:2023cv01466
Plaintiff:
Michael C Sternberg
Defendant:
Shelley Warneck, Jeff Rosen, Steve Wolfson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv01646
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
United States of America v. Internet Transaction Services Inc et al
as 2:2021ms00064
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Internet Transaction Services Inc, Intertrans.com, Inc, Edward Courdy and others
Receiver:
Thomas W. McNamara
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv02368
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Unknown:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Ash v. Berryhill
as 2:2017cv00546
Plaintiff:
Gary Ash
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Ash v. Berryhill
as 2:2017cv00505
Plaintiff:
Garry Ash
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv00467
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Ash v. Pinnacle Services, Inc.
as 3:2016cv00564
Plaintiff:
Mimi Ash
Defendant:
Pinnacle Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Shade v. Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department et al
as 2:2016cv00872
Defendant:
Anthony Ash, J. Collins, David Dockendorf and others
Plaintiff:
Lowell Shade, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
