Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv05609
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
CORE COMMUNICATIONS, INC. et al v. AT&T CORPORATION
as 2:2021cv02771
Plaintiff:
CORETEL WEST VIRGINIA, INC., CORETEL VIRGINIA, LLC, CORETEL NEW JERSEY, INC. and others
Defendant:
AT&T CORPORATION and AT&T CORP.
Petitioner:
AFFINITY NETWORK, INC.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 33
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00275
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
JOHNSON v. BB&T CORPORATION
as 2:2017cv04490
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
BB&T CORPORATION and BRANCH BANKING AND TRUST COMPANY
Plaintiff:
BARBARA JOHNSON
3Rd Party Defendant:
VIRGINIA THOMAS and RICHARD A JOHNSON, JR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Santander Bank, N.A. v. BB&T Corporation
as 1:2017cv01669
Plaintiff:
Santander Bank, N.A.
Defendant:
BB&T Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
KEY INVESTMENTS SERVICES, LLC v. POLIN et al
as 2:2017cv02966
Plaintiff:
KEY INVESTMENTS SERVICES, LLC
Defendant:
CHAD POLIN , RICHARD WALKER and BB&T CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LEWIS v. TRANS UNION, LLC et al
as 5:2017cv02938
Plaintiff:
JULIE LEWIS
Defendant:
TRANS UNION, LLC , EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES, LLC , EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2017cv00683
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00213
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
WILSON et al v. RAM-T CORPORATION et al
as 2:2017cv00291
Plaintiff:
CAMERON WILSON and TOMAYO SHEPHERD
Defendant:
RAM-T CORPORATION and DEBORAH TURNER
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
