Cases 11 - 20 of 25
Menge v. AT&T, et al
as 14-1210
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KENT D. MENGE
Defendant - Appellee:
AT&T, INC., a Delaware corporation, AT&T UMBRELLA BENEFIT PLAN NO. 1, AT&T OPERATIONS, INC., a Delaware corporation and others
AT&T, Inc. v. FCC, et al
as 11-9591
Petitioner:
AT&T, INC.
Respondent:
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2011cv00425
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Menge v. AT&T, Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv00728
Plaintiff:
Kent D. Menge
Defendant:
AT&T, Inc. , AT&T Umbrella Benefit Plan No. 1 , AT&T Operations, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Radtke et al v. American Pro Services Inc et al
as 5:2011cv00190
Plaintiff:
Timothy Scott Radtke , TSR Solutions Inc and CT&T Inc
Defendant:
American Pro Services Inc and American Oilfield Safety Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mantooth v. AT&T, Inc.
as 4:2010cv00261
Plaintiff:
Stephen Mantooth
Defendant:
AT&T, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Midland Pizza, LLC et al v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Company et al
as 2:2010cv02219
Plaintiff:
Midland Pizza, LLC , Pflumm & College Pizza, LLC and Prairie Village Pizza, LLC
Defendant:
Southwestern Bell Telephone Company, AT&T Inc. and AT&T Corp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2009cv00662
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA)
Moore v. Verizon Wireless et al
as 1:2008cv02777
Plaintiff:
Scott Moore
Defendant:
Verizon Wireless, AT&T Inc., Sprint Nextel Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Dolatowski v. Sprint Nextel Corporation et al
as 2:2008cv02505
Plaintiff:
Kathryn Dolatowski
Defendant:
Sprint Nextel Corporation, Verizon Wireless, Verizon Communications, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
