Cases 41 - 50 of 229
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv03281
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Bradley James Much v. The Walt Disney Company et al
as 2:2018cv00083
Defendant:
AT and T Inc., Matthew Stanton Bomer, Give Kids The World and others
Plaintiff:
Bradley James Much
en-Touch Systems, Inc. v. AT and T Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv08756
Defendant:
AT and T Corp., AT and T Inc., AT and T Sports Networks, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
en-Touch Systems, Inc.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv04193
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
AaronSlator v. AT and T Services, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv01430
Defendant:
AT and T Services, Inc, AT and T, Inc. and Does
Plaintiff:
Aaron Slator
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv00746
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Ou-Young v. Star One Credit Union et al
as 5:2016cv07225
Plaintiff:
Kuang-Bao P. Ou-Young
Defendant:
Star One Credit Union, Clayton Marrow, Mike Kamienski and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
United States of America v. DIRECTV Group Holdings, LLC et al
as 2:2016cv08150
Defendant:
AT and T Inc and DIRECTV Group Holdings, LLC
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Adaptix, Inc. v. AT&T, Inc. et al
as 5:2013cv01778
Interested Party:
Apple Inc.
Defendant:
AT&T Mobility LLC, AT&T Inc, HTC America Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Adaptix, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
U.S. Ethernet Innovations, LLC v. AT&T Mobility, LLC et al
as 4:2010cv05254
Defendant:
Macy's Retail Holdings, Inc., The Dress Barn, Inc., Kirkland's Stores, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
U.S. Ethernet Innovations, LLC
Counter Defendant:
Sigma Designs, Inc.
Not Classified By Court:
Kwan Chan
Intervenor:
Intel Corporation
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
