Cases 1 - 10 of 16
National Wildlife Federation, Inc., et al v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, et al
as 21-13444
Plaintiff / Appellant:
APALACHICOLA BAY AND RIVER KEEPER, INC., NATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION and FLORIDA WILDLIFE FEDERATION, INC.
Defendant / Appellee:
U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, SECRETARY, US DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY, ASSISTANT SECRETARY OF THE UNITED STATES ARMY (CIVIL WORKS) and others
Intervenor / Appellee:
STATE OF GEORGIA, ATLANTA REGIONAL COMMISSION, CITY OF ATLANTA, GEORGIA and others
State of Alabama v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, et al
as 21-13104
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STATE OF ALABAMA, NATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION, FLORIDA WILDLIFE FEDERATION, INC. and others
Defendant / Appellee:
U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, ROBERT M. SPEER, in his official capacity as Acting Secretary of U.S. Army, DOUGLAS LAMONT, in his official capacity as senior exercising the functions of the Assistant Secretary of the U.S. Army for Civil Works and others
Not Classified By Court:
SERVICE
Intervenor / Appellee:
ATLANTA REGIONAL COMMISSION, CITY OF ATLANTA, CITY OF GAINESVILLE, GEORGIA and others
In Re ACF Basin Water Litigation
as 1:2018mi00043
Plaintiff:
State of Alabama , National Wildlife Federation, Inc. , Florida Wildlife Federation and others
Defendant:
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers , Robert M. Speer , Douglas Lamont and others
Intervenor_defendant:
State of Georgia , Atlanta Regional Commission , City of Atlanta, Georgia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321
State of Alabama v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers et al
as 1:2018cv01529
Plaintiff:
State of Alabama
Defendant:
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers , Robert M. Speer , Douglas Lamont and others
Intervenor_defendant:
State of Georgia , Atlanta Regional Commission , City of Atlanta, Georgia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321
National Wildlife Federation, Inc. et al v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers et al
as 1:2018cv01530
Defendant:
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Douglas Lamont, Todd T. Semonite and others
Plaintiff:
National Wildlife Federation, Inc. , Florida Wildlife Federation and Apalachicola Bay and River Keeper, Inc.
Intervenor_defendant:
State of Georgia , Atlanta Regional Commission , City of Atlanta, Georgia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321
State of Georgia, et al v. United States Army Corps, et al
as 18-10932
Plaintiff - Appellee:
STATE OF GEORGIA, ATLANTA REGIONAL COMMISSION and COBB COUNTY-MARIETTA WATER AUTHORITY
Defendant - Appellant:
UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, SECRETARY OF THE ARMY, ASSISTANT SECRETARY OF THE UNITED STATES ARMY (CIVIL WORKS) and others
The Atlanta Regional Commission et al v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers et al
as 1:2014cv03594
Plaintiff:
The Atlanta Regional Commission and The Cobb County-Marietta Water Authority
Defendant:
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, John McHugh, Jo-Ellen Darcy and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701
SOUTHEAST FEDERAL v. CALDERA, et al
as 3:2008cv00640
Plaintiff:
SOUTHEAST FEDERAL POWER CUSTOMERS, INC. and City of Apalachicola, Florida
Defendant:
LOUIS CALDERA , JOSEPH E. WESTPHAL , ROBERT B. FLOWERS and others
Intervenor:
State of Georgia , COBB COUNTY MARIETTA WATER AUTHORITY , DeKalb County and others
Amicu:
NATIONAL RURAL ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE ASSOCIATION and AMERICAN PUBLIC POWER ASSOCIATION
Cross_defendant:
LOUIS CALDERA, JOSEPH E. WESTPHAL, ROBERT B. FLOWERS and others
Cross_claimant:
State of Georgia and GWINNETT COUNTY
Movant:
MIDDLE CHATTAHOOCHEE RIVER USERS and LAKE LANIER ASSOCIATION, INC.
Intervenor_defendant:
Lake Lanier Association
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv01197
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007mi00154
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
