Cases 31 - 40 of 43
O-Kel-ly v. Schlienz et al
as 1:2011cv00054
Plaintiff:
Lerajjareanra O-Kell-ly
Defendant:
Rodney W Schlienz, Pam Sonnen, Jeffrey Zmuda and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Howard v. Idaho Attorney General et al
as 4:2011cv00019
Petitioner:
Derry Terel Howard, III
Respondent:
Idaho Attorney General and State of Idaho
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Melton v. Wengler et al
as 1:2010cv00364
Petitioner:
Raymond Julius Melton
Respondent:
Timothy Wengler and Idaho Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Videgain v. Valdez et al
as 1:2010cv00104
Petitioner:
Vincent B Videgain
Respondent:
Phillip Valdez and Idaho Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Valdez et al
as 1:2009cv00132
Petitioner:
Robert Richard Jones
Respondent:
Phillip Valdez and Idaho Attorney General
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Powell v. US Attorney General
as 1:2008cv00309
Petitioner:
Carlos Powell
Respondent:
US Attorney General
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Kuehl v. Attorney General of Idaho
as 1:2008cv00196
Petitioner:
Darryl Robin Kuehl
Respondent:
Attorney General of Idaho
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Nunez v. Idaho Attorney General
as 1:2008cv00184
Petitioner:
Adriel Ayon Nunez
Respondent:
Idaho Attorney General
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Demos v. The Governor of the State of Washington et al
as 3:2008cv00123
Petitioner:
John Robert Demos
Defendant:
The Governor of the State of Washington, Attorney General of the State of Washington, The Legislature of the State of Washington and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Behrman v. Idaho Attorney General
as 1:2008cv00050
Petitioner:
John William Behrman
Respondent:
Idaho Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
