Cases 1 - 6 of 6
STRANGE v. BELLOWS
as 1:2024cv00033
Plaintiff:
CLINTON STRANGE
Defendant:
SHENNA BELLOWS
Not Yet Classified:
MAINE ATTORNEY GENERAL - HABEAS CASES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
CASTRO v. SECRETARY OF STATE, SHENNA BELLOWS et al
as 1:2023cv00335
Plaintiff:
JOHN ANTHONY CASTRO
Defendant:
SECRETARY OF STATE, SHENNA BELLOWS and DONALD JOHN TRUMP
Not Classified By Court:
MAINE ATTORNEY GENERAL - NON PRISONER IFP CASES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
MAN AGAINST XTINCTION v. COMMISSIONER OF MAINE DEPARTMENT OF MARINE RESOURCES et al
as 1:2019cv00406
Plaintiff:
MAN AGAINST XTINCTION and MAX
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF MAINE DEPARTMENT OF MARINE RESOURCES and ASSISTANT ADMINISTRATOR OF NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE
Not Yet Classified:
MAINE ATTORNEY GENERAL - NON PRISONER IFP CASES
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 1538
MALLINCKRODT LLC et al v. MAINE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION COMMISSIONER et al
as 1:2008cv00420
Plaintiff:
MALLINCKRODT LLC and UNITED STATES SURGICAL CORPORATION
Defendant:
MAINE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION COMMISSIONER , MAINE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION and ATTORNEY GENERAL, MAINE
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
DOE v. ATTORNEY GENERAL, MAINE et al
as 1:2008cv00230
Plaintiff:
JANE DOE
Defendant:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, MAINE , COMMISSIONER, MAINE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES and SUPERINTENDENT, RIVERVIEW PSYCHIATRIC CENTER
Movant:
ROBERT BRUCE
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
IMS HEALTH INCORPORATED et al v. ATTORNEY GENERAL, MAINE
as 1:2007cv00127
Plaintiff:
IMS HEALTH INCORPORATED , VERISPAN LLC and SOURCE HEALTHCARE ANALYTICS INC
Defendant:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, MAINE
Amicu:
AARP , COMMUNITY CATALYST , NATIONAL LEGISLATIVE ASSOCIATION ON PRESCRIPTION DRUG PRICES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
