Cases 1 - 5 of 5
State of Nevada, et al v. U.S. Department of Labor, et al
as 17-41130
Plaintiff - Appellee:
STATE OF NEVADA, STATE OF TEXAS, STATE OF ALABAMA and others
Defendant - Appellant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, WAGE AND HOUR DIVISION OF THE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, MARY ZIEGLER, in her official capacity as Assistant Administrator for Policy of the Wage and Hour Division and others
Movant - Appellant:
TEXAS AFL-CIO
State of Nevada, et al v. LABR, et al
as 16-41606
Plaintiff - Appellee:
STATE OF NEVADA, STATE OF TEXAS, STATE OF ALABAMA and others
Defendant - Appellant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, THOMAS E. PEREZ, SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, In his official capacity as United States Secretary of Labor, WAGE AND HOUR DIVISION OF THE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR and others
State Of Ohio, et al v. EPA, et al
as 16-3564
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STATE OF OHIO, ATTORNEY GENERAL BILL SCHUETTE, on Behalf of the People of Michigan and STATE OF TENNESSEE
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, JO-ELLEN DARCY, in her official capacity as Assistant Secretary of the Army (Civil Works) and others
The State Of Ohio et al v. United States Environmental Protection Agency et al
as OHS/2:15-cv-02467
Plaintiff:
The State Of Ohio , Attorney General Bill Schuette on Behalf of the People of Michigan and The State of Tennessee
Defendant:
United States Environmental Protection Agency , United States Army Corps of Engineers , Jo-Ellen Darcy and others
The State Of Ohio et al v. United States Environmental Protection Agency et al
as 2:2015cv02467
Plaintiff:
The State Of Ohio , Attorney General Bill Schuette on Behalf of the People of Michigan and The State of Tennessee
Defendant:
United States Environmental Protection Agency , United States Army Corps of Engineers , Jo-Ellen Darcy and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. ยง 1156 Administrative Procedure Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
