Cases 1 - 10 of 548
Martinez v. Martinez, et al
as 24-2105
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO and RICHARD MARTINEZ
Petitioner:
ARMANDO MARTINEZ
Oropeza v. Martinez, et al
as 24-2102
Petitioner:
OSCAR OROPEZA
Respondent:
RICK MARTINEZ, Warden and RAUL TORREZ, Attorney General of the State of New Mexico
Kelly v. Attorney General for the State of New Mexico
as 1:2024cv00642
Petitioner:
Jonathan Kelly
Respondent:
Attorney General for the State of New Mexico
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Salas v. Horton, et al
as 24-2084
Petitioner:
PAUL STEPHEN SALAS
Respondent:
VINCENT HORTON, Warden and HECTOR BALDERAS, Attorney General of the State of New Mexico
Clements v. Rios et al
as 2:2024cv00486
Respondent:
Hector Rios and Attorney General for the State of New Mexico
Petitioner:
James Clements
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ogden v. Turner, et al
as 24-2079
Respondent:
NEIL TURNER, Warden, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO and GUADALUPE COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Petitioner:
KEVIN OGDEN
Maldonado v. Attorney General for the State of New Mexico
as 2:2024cv00469
Respondent:
Attorney General for the State of New Mexico
Petitioner:
Frankie Maldonado
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Arredondo v. Rios et al
as 2:2024cv00365
Petitioner:
Sergio Arredondo
Respondent:
H. Rios and Attorney General of the State of New Mexico
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Thompkins v. Santistevan, et al
as 24-2054
Petitioner:
TERRICK L. THOMPKINS
Respondent:
DWAYNE SANTISTEVAN, Warden and HECTOR H. BALDERAS, Attorney General of the State of New Mexico
Cavazos v. Rios
as 2:2024cv00309
Petitioner:
Roy G Cavazos
Respondent:
Hector Rios and Attorney General of the State of New Mexico
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
