Cases 21 - 30 of 33
James Newman Hood v. John Ratille, et al
as 5:1999cv00427
Respondent:
Attorney General State of California and John Ratille
Petitioner:
James Newman Hood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hunter v. Attorney General State of California et al
as 1:2009cv01556
Plaintiff:
Leroy Dewitt Hunter
Defendant:
Attorney General State of California, Ken Clark, L. Polk and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mcintosh v. Holder et al
as 3:2009cv00750
Petitioner:
Ronald J. Mcintosh
Respondent:
Eric H. Holder, Jr. and Attorney General State of California
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Vasquez v. Felker
as 1:2008cv00662
Petitioner:
Sergio Vasquez
Respondent:
T. Felker and Attorney General State of California
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Vasquez v. Felker
as 2:2008cv00740
Petitioner:
Sergio Vasquez
Respondent:
T. Felker and Attorney General State of California
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
White v. Walker et al
as 2:2008cv00237
Petitioner:
Tyrone Ali White
Respondent:
J Walker and Attorney General State of California
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Floyd v. Giurbino et al
as 2:2008cv00094
Petitioner:
Malachi Floyd
Respondent:
G J Giurbino and Attorney General State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Yonai v Walker
as 2:2008cv00012
Petitioner:
Jason Yonai
Respondent:
- Walker and Attorney General State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv01581
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Coram Nobis
Campos v. Yates, et al.
as 1:2007cv01388
Petitioner:
Ralph William Campos
Respondent:
James A. Yates and Attorney General State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
