Cases 1 - 10 of 64
Contreras v. Aurora Loan Services, LLC
as 1:2017cv23511
Plaintiff:
Hugo O. Contreras
Defendant:
Aurora Loan Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Contreras v. Aurora Loan Services LLC et al
as 1:2016cv24862
Defendant:
Aurora Loan Services LLC and Nationstar Mortgage
Plaintiff:
Marie Contreras
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Wright v. Nationstar Mortgage LLC
as 1:2016cv23663
Plaintiff:
Nardeah Wright
Defendant:
Nationstar Mortgage LLC , Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc., Aegis Wholesale Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2016cv01585
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Aurora Loan Services, LLC v. Allen
as 0:2016cv61085
Defendant:
Lorenzo Allen
Plaintiff:
Aurora Loan Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Aurora Loan Services, LLC v. Williams et al
as 0:2016cv60907
Plaintiff:
Aurora Loan Services, LLC
Defendant:
Eugene James Williams and Donna Hickenbottom, et al
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Pollina v. Aurora Loan Services, LLC et al
as 2:2015cv00637
Plaintiff:
Victor Pollina
Defendant:
Aurora Loan Services, LLC , RCS Recovery Services, LLC and Hunt & Kahn, P.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Salmon et al v. Aurora Loan Services, LLC. et al
as 8:2015cv02339
Plaintiff:
Albert Salmon and Cleofe L. Pearcy
Defendant:
Aurora Loan Services, LLC. , Nationstar Mortgage, LLC. and Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Ham v. Nationstar Mortgage, LLC. et al
as 3:2015cv00939
Plaintiff:
David Lee Ham, Jr.
Defendant:
Nationstar Mortgage, LLC. , Aurora Bank FSB , Aurora Loan Services, LLC. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Aurora Loan Services, LLC v. Naftali
as 0:2015cv61497
Plaintiff:
Aurora Loan Services, LLC
Defendant:
Moshe Naftali
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
