Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Williams et al v. Mitchell et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2022cv02340
Plaintiff: Jessie Williams, Brandon Jackson and Abdul Love
Defendant: David Mitchell, Chaplin Arnold, C. Hale and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Love v. Lake County et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv05941
Defendant: Speck, Lake County, Wexford Health Sources, Inc. and others
Plaintiff: Abdul Love
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Love v. Meyers et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2018cv02000
Defendant: Larue Love, Dr. Meyers, John Baldwin and others
Plaintiff: Abdul Love
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Love v. Wexford Health Sources, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv02218
Defendant: John R. Baldwin, Boswell Pharmacy Services, Bantry Group and others
Plaintiff: Abdul Love
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Love v. Korte et al
as 1:2016cv08720
Petitioner: Abdul Love
Respondent: Jeff Korte
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Love v. Korte et al
as 3:2016cv03120
Plaintiff: Abdul Love
Defendant: Jeff Korte, Penny Ruiz, Hamilton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Love v. Dickerson et al
as 1:2016cv04352
Plaintiff: Abdul Love
Defendant: Dickerson, Carr, Nickolas Lamb and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Love v. Wexford Health Sources et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2016cv03095
Plaintiff: Abdul Love
Defendant: Jeff Korte, Hobrock, Baker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Abdul Love v. DOJ
as 16-5033
Plaintiff - Appellant: Abdul Love
Defendant - Appellee: United States Department of Justice
Love v. Williams et al
as 1:2015cv06571
Plaintiff: Abdul Love
Defendant: Tarry Williams, Wexford Health Service, Saleh Obaisi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?