Cases 51 - 54 of 54
Hammerl
as 5:2008cv04754
Plaintiff:
Christian Hammerl and Christian Hammerl
Defendant:
Acer Europe, S.A., Acer America Corporation and Acer America Corporation
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Acer Inc et al v. Hewlett-Packard Company
as 8:2008cv00594
Plaintiff:
Acer Inc, Acer Inc, Acer America Corporation and others
Defendant:
Hewlett-Packard Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Enforcement of Administrative Subpoena
Acer, Inc. et al v. Technology Properties Limited et al
as 5:2008cv00877
Special Master:
Thomas HR Denver
Defendant:
Patriot Scientific Corporation, Alliacense Limited and Technology Properties Limited
Plaintiff:
Acer, Inc., Gateway, Inc., Acer America Corporation and others
Petitioner:
Non Party Texas Instruments Incorporated and LSI Corporation
Interested Party:
HTC America, Inc. and HTC Corporation
Not Classified By Court:
Kwan Chan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
In Re TFT-LCD (Flat Panel) Antitrust Litigation
as 3:2007md01827
Defendant:
Toshiba Mobile Display Company, Ltd., Sony Corporation, Samsung Semiconductor, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Tammy Long, Judd Eliasoph, Robert Harmon and others
Intervenor:
Leah Nylen, Chris Donnelly, State of Mississippi and others
Special Master:
Martin Quinn, Mr. Daniel Weinstein and Fern M Smith
Not Classified By Court:
Julius N. Dunmore, Jr., Stefan Rest, Dale Keena and others
Counter Defendant:
Rockwell Automation Inc., Sony Computer Entertainment America, LLC, Acer America Corporation and others
Interested Party:
Douglas C. Giordan, Joseph M. Alioto, Alexandra Brudy and others
Counter Claimant:
LG Display Co., Ltd. and LG Display America, Inc.
Amicus Curiae:
State of South Carolina and State of California
Claimant:
Tiffany and Company, CA Technologies, Inc., American University and others
Trustee:
Charles W Daff
Petitioner:
Fanshawe College of Applied Arts and Technology
3Rd Party Defendant:
Ricoh Electronics, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
