Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Romero, Jr. v. Bentivegna et al
as 1:2024cv05251
Defendant:
Robert Bentivegna, Mary Ashong, David Lindeman and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Romero, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Diggs v. Dinello et al
as 1:2023cv07149
Plaintiff:
Ronald Diggs
Defendant:
David Dinello, Edwin Uzu, Kyoung Kim and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dickinson v. Mueller et al
as 1:2023cv05657
Plaintiff:
Shannon Dickinson
Defendant:
Susan Mueller, Chung Lee and Albert Acrish
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Oleman v. Hammer et al
as 1:2023cv03607
Plaintiff:
Robert Oleman
Defendant:
John Hammer, Robert Bentivegna, Kathryn Infantino and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Dinello et al
as 1:2023cv03608
Plaintiff:
Derrick Williams
Defendant:
David Dinello, Yelena Korobkova, Albert Acrish and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Locenitt v. Dinello et al
as 1:2023cv03399
Plaintiff:
Kiaza Locenitt
Defendant:
David Dinello, Kristin Salotti, Janice Wolf and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alston v. Mueller et al
as 1:2023cv03290
Plaintiff:
John Alston
Defendant:
Dr. Susan Mueller, Yelena Korobkova, N.P. Albert Acrish and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nunez v. Bentivegna et al
as 1:2022cv05673
Plaintiff:
Toby Nunez
Defendant:
Dr. Robert Bentivegna, Kyoung S. Kim, Mary Ashong and others
Interested Party:
NEW YORK STATE ATTORNEY GENERAL OFFICE-GENERIC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anekwe v. Bernstein et al
as 1:2021cv11108
Plaintiff:
Peter Anekwe
Defendant:
Frederick Bernstein and Albert Acrish
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Illescas v. Annucci et al
as 7:2021cv08473
Plaintiff:
Silvo R. Illescas
Defendant:
Anthony J. Annucci, Dr. John Morley, Dr. Robert V. Bentivegna and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
