Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Advantage Behavioral Health Systems et al v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv03442
Defendant:
Allergan PLC, Par Pharmaceutical Companies, Inc., Allergan Finance, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Satilla Community Services doing business as Unison Behavioral Health, Georgia Mountains Community Services doing business as Avita Community Partners, Advantage Behavioral Health Systems and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964
St. Joseph's/Candler Health System, Inc. v. Amerisourcebergen Drug Corporation et al
as 4:2020cv00166
Defendant:
Allergan Plc, Actavis Pharma, Inc., McKesson Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
St. Joseph's/Candler Health System, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Bolden v. Teva Pharmaceutical Industries, Ltd. et al
as 1:2019cv05354
Defendant:
Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc., McKesson Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Bolden
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964
County of Fannin v. Rite Aid of Georgia, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv00220
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, Purdue Pharma L.P., Teva Pharmaceuticals USA Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
County of Fannin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Henry County, Georgia v. Purdue Pharma, LP et al
as 1:2018cv03899
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, Mallinckrodt, LLC, Endo Health Solutions, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Henry County, Georgia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
HOUSTON COUNTY v. PURDUE PHARMA LP et al
as 5:2018cv00248
Defendant:
MCKESSON CORPORATION, ACTAVIS PHARMA, INC. f/k/a WATSON PHARMA, INC., PURDUE PHARMA L.P. and others
Plaintiff:
HOUSTON COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
DeKalb County, Georgia v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al
as 1:2018cv01498
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, Purdue Pharma L.P., Actavis, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
DeKalb County, Georgia
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
