Cases 1 - 7 of 7
ELI LILLY AND COMPANY v. ACTAVIS LLC et al
as 1:2017cv04299
Defendant:
ACTAVIS LLC, TEVA PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES LTD. and TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC.
Plaintiff:
ELI LILLY AND COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
ELI LILLY AND COMPANY v. ACTAVIS LLC et al
as 1:2017cv00982
Defendant:
ACTAVIS LLC, TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC. and TEVA PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES LTD.
Plaintiff:
ELI LILLY AND COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145
ELI LILLY AND COMPANY et al v. ACCORD HEALTHCARE INC., USA et al
as 1:2014cv00389
Defendant:
ACCORD HEALTHCARE INC., USA, ACCORD HEALTHCARE, INC., ACTAVIS INC. and others
D/b/a ZYDUS CADILA:
CADILA HEALTHCARE LTD.
Counter Defendant:
DAIICHI SANKYO CO., LTD., DAIICHI SANKYO CO., LTD., DAIICHI SANKYO, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
DAIICHI SANKYO CO., LTD., DAIICHI SANKYO, INC., ELI LILLY AND COMPANY and others
Counter Claimant:
PAR PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANIES, INC., PAR PHARMACEUTICAL, INC. and TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
ELI LILLY AND COMPANY et al v. WATSON LABORATORIES, INC. et al
as 1:2013cv01799
Plaintiff:
ACRUX DDS PTY LTD., ELI LILLY AND COMPANY and ELI LILLY EXPORT S.A.
Defendant:
ACTAVIS PHARMA, INC., ACTAVIS, INC. and WATSON LABORATORIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
ELI LILLY AND COMPANY v. ACTAVIS TOTOWA LLC et al
as 1:2010cv00836
Defendant:
ACTAVIS ELIZABETH LLC and ACTAVIS TOTOWA LLC
Plaintiff:
ELI LILLY AND COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
ELI LILLY AND COMPANY v. ACTAVIS ELIZABETH LLC
as 1:2008cv01559
Plaintiff:
ELI LILLY AND COMPANY
Defendant:
ACTAVIS ELIZABETH LLC
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
ELI LILLY AND COMPANY v. ACTAVIS ELIZABETH LLC
as 1:2007cv01023
Plaintiff:
ELI LILLY AND COMPANY
Defendant:
ACTAVIS ELIZABETH LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
