Cases filed in New York
Cases 1 - 10 of 145
Ellington v. Sanofi US Services Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv08197
Defendant: Sanofi US Services Inc., Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Inc., Hospira Worldwide, LLC and others
Plaintiff: Tanya Ellington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
In re ACTOS Antitrust Litigation We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2013cv09244
Plaintiff: 199 SEIU-National Benefit Fund, Plumbers & Pipefitters Local 178 Health & Welfare Trust Fund, United Food and Commercial Workers Local 1776 & Participating Employers Health a and others
Consolidated Plaintiff: A.F. of L. - A.G.C. Building Trades Welfare Plan, City of Providence, Rhode Island, Crosby Tugs, LLC and others
Defendant: Actavis plc, Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc., Mylan, Inc. and others
Consolidated Defendant: Takeda Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc. and Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd.
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider: Ranbaxy Pharmaceuticals Inc. and American Sales Company, LLC
Amicus Curiae: Cesar Castillo, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 bc Diversity-Breach of Contract
IN RE NAMENDA INDIRECT PURCHASER ANTITRUST LITIGATION We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2015cv06549
Plaintiff: Sergeants Benevolent Association Health & Welfare Fund and A.F. of L.- A.G.C. Building Trades Welfare Plan
Consolidated Plaintiff: MSP Recovery Claims, Series LLC and MSPA Claims I, LLC
Petitioner: JM Smith Corporation
Defendant: Actavis, plc, Forest Laboratories, LLC, Merz Pharmaceuticals GmbH & Co. KGaA and others
Consolidated Defendant: Allergan plc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
In Re: Actos Direct Purchaser Antitrust Litigation We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2015cv03278
Plaintiff: American Sales Company, LLC, Meijer, Inc. and Meijer Distribution, Inc.
Consolidated Plaintiff: Cesar Castillo, Inc.
Defendant: Takeda Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., Takeda America Holdings, Inc., Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation (Monopolizing Trade)
IN RE ACTOS END PAYOR ANTITRUST LITIGATION
as 1:2014cv02846
Defendant: Actavis plc, Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited, Takeda America Holdings, Inc. and others
Plaintiff: Man-U Service Contract Trust Fund and Teamsters Union Local 115 Health & Welfare Fund
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation (Monopolizing Trade)
Kulkarni v. Actavis Generics et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv05735
Plaintiff: Nivedita T. Kulkarni
Defendant: Actavis Generics, Actavis Laboratories UT, Inc., Actavis Laboratories FL, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 pl Diversity-Product Liability
County Of Westchester v. Actavis Holdco US, Inc. et al
as 7:2021cv07893
Plaintiff: County Of Westchester
Defendant: Actavis Holdco US, Inc., Actavis Elizabeth LLC, Actavis Pharma, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15
Erie County Medical Center Corporation et al v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv00826
Defendant: Actavis Pharma, Inc., Actavis LLC, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Plaintiff: Erie County Medical Center Corporation, Catholic Health System, Inc., Sisters of Charity Hospital of Buffalo, New York and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Conley v. Anjanta Pharma USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv00463
Defendant: Heritage Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Novitium Pharma, LLC, PAI Holdings, LLC and others
Plaintiff: Sandra Conley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
County of Albany et al v. Actavis Holdco US, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv01650
Defendant: Bausch Health Americas, Inc., Heritage Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Amneal Pharmaceuticals, LLC and others
Plaintiff: County of Schuyler, City of Mobile, WCA Group Health Trust and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?