Cases 51 - 58 of 58
Lansing, City of v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al
as 1:2017cv01114
Plaintiff:
Lansing, City of
Defendant:
Purdue Pharma L.P., Cephalon, Inc., Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Saginaw, County of v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al
as 1:2017cv14076
Plaintiff:
Saginaw, County of
Defendant:
Purdue Pharma L.P., Cephalon, Inc., Teva Pharmaceuticals Industries Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Genesee, County of v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al
as 4:2017cv14074
Plaintiff:
Genesee, County of
Defendant:
Purdue Pharma L.P., Cephalon, Inc., Teva Pharmaceuticals Industries Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
City of Detroit, Michigan, A Municipal Corporation v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al
as 2:2017cv14075
Plaintiff:
City of Detroit, Michigan, A Municipal Corporation
Defendant:
Purdue Pharma L.P., Cephalon, Inc., Teva Pharmaceuticals Industries Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Torres v. Wyeth LLC et al
as 2:2013cv11258
Plaintiff:
Daniel Torres
Defendant:
Wyeth LLC , Wyeth Pharmaceuticals, Incorporated, Pfizer, Inc and others
Cupchak et al v. Actavis Totowa LLC et al CASE TRANSFERRED
as 2:2009cv13443
Plaintiff:
Terry Cupchak and Alex Cupchak
Defendant:
Actavis Totowa LLC, Actavis Totowa LLC, Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Type:
Other Statutes
Weiland v. Actavis Totowa, LLC et al CASE TRANSFERRED
as 2:2009cv11305
Plaintiff:
David W Weiland
Defendant:
Actavis Totowa, LLC, Actavis Incorporated, Actavis Elizabeth, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Harris et al v. Actavis Totowa LLC et al
as 2:2008cv12898
Plaintiff:
Anthony Harris and Stephen B Love
Defendant:
Actavis Totowa LLC, Actavis Elizabeth LLC, Actavis US and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
