Cases 1 - 7 of 7
NOVARTIS PHARMACEUTICALS CORPORATION et al v. ACTAVIS ELIZABETH LLC et al
as 2:2012cv01798
Plaintiff:
NOVARTIS PHARMACEUTICALS CORPORATION , NOVARTIS CORPORATION , NOVARTIS AG and others
Defendant:
ACTAVIS ELIZABETH LLC, ACTAVIS, INC., ACTAVIS GROUP PTC EHF and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
SCHERING CORPORATION et al v. ACTAVIS INC. et al
as 2:2011cv06067
Plaintiff:
SCHERING CORPORATION , MSP SINGAPORE COMPANY LLC and MSD INTERNATIONAL GmbH
Defendant:
ACTAVIS INC. and ACTAVIS GROUP HF
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
ABBOTT LABORATORIES et al v. ACTAVIS ELIZABETH LLC et al
as 2:2010cv02352
Plaintiff:
ABBOTT LABORATORIES and FOURNIER LABORATORIES IRELAND LTD.
Defendant:
ACTAVIS INC., ACTAVIS GROUP HF and ACTAVIS ELIZABETH LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
WARNER CHILCOTT LABORATORIES IRELAND LIMITED et al v. ACTAVIS ELIZABETH LLC et al
as 2:2009cv00469
Plaintiff:
WARNER CHILCOTT LABORATORIES IRELAND LIMITED, WARNER CHILCOTT COMPANY, INC., WARNER CHILCOTT (US), LLC and others
Defendant:
ACTAVIS ELIZABETH LLC, ACTAVIS INC. and ACTAVIS GROUP HF.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
SANOFI-AVENTIS U.S. LLC et al v. MUSTAFA NEVZAT ILAC SANAYH A.S. et al
as 3:2007cv03142
Plaintiff:
SANOFI-AVENTIS U.S. LLC, SANOFI-AVENTIS and DEBIOPHARM, S.A.
Defendant:
ACTAVIS TOTOWA LLC, ACTAVIS, INC. and ACTAVIS GROUP HF
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
SANOFI-AVENTIS U.S. LLC et al v. SANDOZ, INC.
as 3:2007cv02762
Defendant:
MUSTAFA NEVZAT ILAC SANAYII A.S., SANDOZ, INC., TEVA PARENTERAL MEDICINES, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
SANOFI-AVENTIS U.S. LLC, SANOFI-AVENTIS and DEBIOPHARM, S.A.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
CIMA LABS, INC. et al v. ACTAVIS GROUP HF et al
as 2:2007cv00893
Plaintiff:
CIMA LABS, INC., CIMA LABS, INC., SCHWARZ PHARMA, INC. and others
Defendant:
ACTAVIS GROUP HF, ACTAVIS, INC. and ACTAVIS ELIZABETH LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
