Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Garcia v. Acting Warden, Miami FCI et al
as 1:2023cv21295
Plaintiff:
Jose Garcia
Defendant:
Acting Warden, Miami FCI, Attorney General and United States of America
Cordon-Lemus v. Acting Warden, Miami FCI et al
as 1:2023cv21245
Plaintiff:
Manuel Felipe Cordon-Lemus
Defendant:
Acting Warden, Miami FCI, Immigration & Customs Enforcement and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Saez v. United States of America et al
as 1:2023cv21247
Plaintiff:
Juan Saez
Defendant:
United States of America and Acting Warden, Miami FCI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Tenorio v. United States of America et al
as 1:2023cv21183
Plaintiff:
Julian Andres-Tenorio and Julian Andres Tenorio
Defendant:
United States of America, Norris, Immigration and Customs Enforcement and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Gutierrez v. United States of America et al
as 1:2023cv21064
Plaintiff:
Eduardo Gutierrez
Defendant:
United States of America and Acting Warden, Miami FCI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Vega v. Acting Warden, Miami FCI
as 1:2023cv20280
Plaintiff:
Christopher Vega
Defendant:
Acting Warden, Miami FCI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
BALDWIN v. ACTING WARDEN FCI MARIANNA
as 5:2021cv00169
Petitioner:
TERRY BALDWIN
Defendant:
ACTING WARDEN FCI MARIANNA and FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Diaz v. United States of America et al
as 1:2018cv23021
Defendant:
Warden, Acting Warden and United States of America
Plaintiff:
Luis Enrique Diaz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
RONEY v. CLARK et al
as 4:2007cv00080
Plaintiff:
DAVID E. RONEY
Defendant:
K.W. CLARK, PILAR TOURNAY, ACTING WARDEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
