Cases 11 - 20 of 54
Hamilton v. Gittere et al
as 3:2018cv00555
Respondent:
William Gittere
Defendant:
Adam Paul Laxalt
Petitioner:
Tamir Hamilton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Carter v. Sandoval et al
as 2:2018cv02064
Defendant:
Fowler, NDOC, James M. Wright and others
Plaintiff:
Shannon Carter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lagunas v. Nevada Board of Prison Commissioners et al
as 2:2018cv02039
Defendant:
Nevada Board of Prison Commissioners, Adam Paul Laxalt, Sonya Carillo and others
Plaintiff:
Enrique Lagunas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bayot v. NV Board of Prison Commissioners et al
as 2:2018cv01420
Defendant:
Brian Sandover, NV Board of Prison Commissioners, Frank Dreesen and others
Plaintiff:
Alexander B. Bayot
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stanley Rimer v. Brian Sandoval, et al
as 18-16273
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STANLEY RIMER
Defendant - Appellee:
BRIAN SANDOVAL, CATHERINE CORTEZ-MASTO, BOARD OF PAROLE COMMISSIONERS and others
Leonard v. Filson et al
as 2:2018cv00853
Defendant:
Timothy Filson and Adam Paul Laxalt
Plaintiff:
Gregory N. Leonard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. Filson et al
as 2:2018cv00740
Respondent:
Timothy Filson and Adam Paul Laxalt
Unknown:
Adam P. Laxalt and Adam P. Laxalt
Petitioner:
Donte Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Omar Qazi v. State of Nevada, et al
as 18-15546
Petitioner - Appellant:
OMAR QAZI
Respondent - Appellee:
STATE OF NEVADA and ADAM PAUL LAXALT
LaChance v. Wickham et al
as 3:2017cv00689
Respondent:
James Dzurenda, Adam Paul Laxalt and Harold Wickham
Petitioner:
Darren Gabriel LaChance
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Phillips v. Laxalt
as 2:2017cv02545
Defendant:
Adam Paul Laxalt
Plaintiff:
Vornelius J. Phillips
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
