Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Rover Pipeline LLC v. Bartter et al
as 5:2017cv00239
Defendant:
Bartter, Dominion Resources, Inc., NiSource Corporate Services Company and others
Plaintiff:
Rover Pipeline LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Smith, et al. v. CSX Transportation Inc., et al
as 3:2013cv02649
Defendant:
CSX Transportation Inc. and CSX Corporation
Plaintiff:
Jenni M. Smith and Adam Stamper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1396
RBS Citizens N.A. v. Demand et al
as 1:2011cv00668
Plaintiff:
RBS Citizens N.A.
Defendant:
Adam G Demand and Actual Name Unknown, Present Spouse, if any, of Adam G. Demand
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
NovaStar Mortgage, Inc. v. Adams et al
as 1:2007cv02705
Plaintiff:
NovaStar Mortgage, Inc.
Defendant:
Dale Adams, Sr., Unknown Spouse of Dale Adams Sr., Tya Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
LaSalle Bank National Association v. Adams
as 1:2007cv02318
Plaintiff:
LaSalle Bank National Association
Defendant:
Dale Adams, Tya D. Adams, Joseph B. Kirsch and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Deutsche Bank National Trust Company v. Alexander et al
as 1:2007cv00590
Plaintiff:
Deutsche Bank National Trust Company and Deutsche Bank National Trust Company
Defendant:
James Alexander and Tiffany Alexander
3rd Party Plaintiff:
James Alexander and Tiffany Alexander
3rd Pty Defendant:
Real Assets Fund, Uri Gofman, Dale Adams and others
Counter-Claimant:
James Alexander and Tiffany Alexander
Counter-Defendant:
Deutsche Bank National Trust Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
First Franklin Financial Corp. v. Adams et al
as 1:2007cv00582
Plaintiff:
First Franklin Financial Corp.
Defendant:
Michael A. Adams, II, Child Support Enforcement Agency of Cuyahoga County, Child Support Enforcement Agency of Cuyahoga County and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
