Civil Rights Cases filed in New York
Cases 1 - 10 of 795
RSS Feed | View as table | Sort by last update
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03614
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03557
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Woodstock et al v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2024cv03418
Plaintiff: Shahid Woodstock, Jahiem Smith and Tiffanie Narinesammy
Defendant: The City of New York, Mayor of the City of New York Eric Adams, Deputy Mayor of Public Safety Philip Banks III and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03503
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Does et al v. New York City et al
as 1:2024cv03042
Plaintiff: John Does and Jane Does
Defendant: New York City, Mayor Eric Adams, NYPD Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02995
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1201 Civil Rights (Disability)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02996
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1201 Civil Rights (Disability)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02889
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1201 Civil Rights (Disability)
Esseily v. Hochul et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2024cv02932
Plaintiff: Ali Esseily
Defendant: Kathy Hochul, Letitia James, Eric Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02736
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1201 Civil Rights (Disability)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?