Cases 21 - 30 of 32
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00125
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2014cv00334
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Blankenship et al v. McDevitt et al
as 2:2014cv00281
Plaintiff:
Laura Blankenship and Lamont Mandarino
Defendant:
Todd McDevitt, Adam Durflinger and Shoshone County Sheriff's Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ratcliff v. Barghoorn et al
as 1:2014cv00171
Plaintiff:
Norma Ratcliff
Defendant:
Sikko Barghoorn, Adams County and David Pattan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Saetrum v. Ada County Sheriff's Office et al
as 1:2013cv00425
Plaintiff:
Adam Todd Saetrum
Defendant:
Ada County Sheriff's Office, Gary Raney, Jake Vogt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv00267
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Oresco v. Bureau of Indian Affairs et al
as 4:2011cv00184
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Adam Oresco
Defendant:
Bureau of Indian Affairs, Shoshone-Bannock Tribal Business Council, Shoshone-Bannock Tribal Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clymer et al v. Boise Police Department et al
as 1:2010cv00198
Plaintiff:
Adam Clymer , Anne Clymer and Samuel Clymer
Defendant:
Boise Police Department , Billie Cox , Chad Hurty and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Naum v. Idaho Department of Health and Welfare et al
as 1:2009cv00633
Plaintiff:
James Naum
Defendant:
Idaho Department of Health and Welfare, Barbara K. Richards, Janice Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Schwartz et al v. Adams County et al
as 1:2009cv00019
Plaintiff:
Troy Schwartz, Troy Schwartz and Alvin Yantis
Defendant:
Adams County, William P Brown, Josph F Holmes and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
