Cases 1 - 10 of 791
Does et al v. New York City et al
as 1:2024cv03042
Plaintiff:
John Does and Jane Does
Defendant:
New York City, Mayor Eric Adams, NYPD Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02995
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1201 Civil Rights (Disability)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02996
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1201 Civil Rights (Disability)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02889
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1201 Civil Rights (Disability)
Esseily v. Hochul et al
as 1:2024cv02932
Plaintiff:
Ali Esseily
Defendant:
Kathy Hochul, Letitia James, Eric Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02736
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1201 Civil Rights (Disability)
Rachlin v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2024cv02626
Plaintiff:
Dana Rachlin
Defendant:
The City of New York, Mayor of the City of New York Eric Adams, NYPD Commissioner Dermot Shea and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Thomas v. City of New York et al
as 1:2024cv02534
Plaintiff:
Shawn Randall Thomas
Defendant:
City of New York, Eric Leroy Adams, Keechant Sewell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cardwood v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2024cv02382
Plaintiff:
Armani Cardwood
Defendant:
The City of New York, Adam A Arce and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02419
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
