Cases 21 - 30 of 302
Garner v. Village of Lemont et al
as 1:2023cv05694
Plaintiff:
Adam Garner
Defendant:
Village of Lemont and Nick Pappas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bergeron v. City Of Rochelle Police Department et al
as 3:2023cv50278
Plaintiff:
Adam Ken Bergeron
Defendant:
City Of Rochelle Police Department and Officer Elvis Baneski
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Patinkin v. Sutker-Dermer et al
as 1:2023cv03540
Plaintiff:
Seth S. Patinkin
Defendant:
Shelley Sutker-Dermer, Jeffrey L. Warnick, Adam M. Kingsley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Robinson v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2023cv03400
Plaintiff:
Evans Robinson, III and Evan Robinson
Defendant:
City of Chicago, C.J. Smith, C.W. Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
The Satanic Temple Inc. et al v. The City of Chicago
as 1:2023cv02780
Plaintiff:
The Satanic Temple Inc. and Adam Vavrick
Defendant:
The City of Chicago
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Adam v. Everett McKIenley Dirksen
as 1:2023cv02324
Plaintiff:
Ronald Adam
Defendant:
Everett McKIenley Dirksen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02263
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02156
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Hendrix et al v. Garcia et al
as 1:2023cv02120
Plaintiff:
Adam Hendrix
Defendant:
Leonardo Garcia, Reginald Mathews, Ari Fisz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01641
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
