Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Ronnell Dunn v. Xavier Beccera, et al
as 21-55094
Respondent / Appellee:
XAVIER BECCERA, The Attorney General of the State of California, Additional Respondent and RALPH DIAZ
Petitioner / Appellant:
RONNELL DUNN
Ellery Thomas v. Raymond Madden, et al
as 20-55341
Respondent / Appellee:
XAVIER BECERRA, The Attorney General of the State of the California, Additional Respondent and RAYMOND MADDEN, Warden
Petitioner / Appellant:
ELLERY DENNIS THOMAS
Tagle v. Neven et al
as 2:2015cv00214
Respondent:
Warden Neven and The Attorney General of the State of Additional Respondent
Petitioner:
Victor Tagle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Gerardo Garcia v. William Knipp, et al
as 12-55467
Petitioner - Appellant:
GERARDO PARDO GARCIA
Respondent - Appellee:
WILLIAM KNIPP, Warden and KAMALA HARRIS, The Attorney General of the State of California, Additional Respondent
Johnny Lopez v. James Yates, et al
as 12-55247
Petitioner - Appellant:
JOHNNY LOPEZ
Respondent - Appellee:
JAMES A. YATES, Warden and C. HARRIS, The Attorney General of the State of California, Additional Respondent
Cornele Overstreet v. Advanced Architectural Metals,, et al
as 10-16178
Petitioner - Appellee:
CORNELE A. OVERSTREET, Regional Director of the Twenty-Eighth Region of the National Labor Relations Board, for and on behalf of the National Labor Relations Board
Respondent:
ADVANCED ARCHITECTURAL METALS, INC., AKA Advanced Metals, Inc. and STEEL SPECIALTIES UNLIMITED, INC., a Single Employer
Respondent - Appellant:
LORI IRISH, Additional Respondent in Contempt
Williams v. Wisconsin Court of Appeals, District One et al
as 3:2009cv00024
Petitioner:
David E. Williams
Respondent:
Wisconsin Court of Appeals, District One, Secretary of the Wisconsin Department of Corrections, The Attorney General of the State of Wisconsin and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
