Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv16674
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Washington v. Addus Healthcare, Inc.
as 1:2020cv07663
Plaintiff:
Tammy A. Washington
Defendant:
Addus Healthcare, Inc. doing business as Addus Homecare
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Lifestyle Options, Inc. et al v. Addus Nurse Care, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv04685
Defendant:
Addus Nurse Care, Inc. and Addus HealthCare, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Lifestyle Options, Inc. and Molly Miceli
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smego v. Mitchell et al
as 1:2014cv08541
Plaintiff:
Richard Smego
Defendant:
Jacqueline Mitchell
Respondent:
Addus Healthcare, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Type:
Other Statutes
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv08263
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv50192
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003
Addus Healthcare, Inc. et al v. Auto-Owners Insurance Company
as 1:2011cv03788
Plaintiff:
Addus Healthcare, Inc. and Whitney Clendenin
Defendant:
Auto-Owners Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv06643
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Johnson v. Addus Healthcare Inc. et al
as 3:2009cv00358
Plaintiff:
Victoria Johnson
Defendant:
Addus Healthcare Inc. and Carl Robert Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv02601
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
