Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Maldonado v. Adirondack Correctional Facility
as 22-6513
Petitioner:
SAMUEL MALDONADO
Respondent:
WARDEN, ADIRONDACK CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, STATE OF NEW YORK and PAROLE AND COMMUNITY SUPERVISION
Maldonado v. Adirondack Correctional Facility
as 22-6512
Petitioner:
SAMUEL MALDONADO
Respondent:
WARDEN, ADIRONDACK CORRECTIONAL FACILITY and PAROLE AND COMMUNITY SUPERVISION
Gibson v. Ingraham
as 21-1664
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Bennie Gibson
Defendant / Appellee:
Young, Correctional Officer, Coxsackie Correctional Facility and Ingraham, Correctional Officer, Coxsackie Correctional Facility
Defendant:
Brian S. Fischer, Commissioner of New York State Department of Correctional Services, Deputy Commissioner, New York State Department of Correctional Services, ADA Perez, Warden, Downstate Correctional Facility and others
Maldonado v. Warden Adirondack Correction F
as 19-2615
Respondent / Appellee:
Warden Adirondack Correctional Facility, Parole and Community Supervision and State of New York
Petitioner / Appellant:
Samuel Maldonado
Gonzalez v. Morris
as 19-1046
Defendant / Appellee:
Cheryl Morris, Director of Ministerial, Family and Volunteer Services and Stan Barton, Deputy Superintendent of Programs of ADK
Defendant:
Joseph Payton, Deputy Superintendent of Programs of ADK and Jeffrey Tedford, Superintendent; Adirondack Correctional Facility
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Michael Gonzalez
Gibson v. Ingraham
as 19-477
Defendant:
John Does 1-3, 5-6, Correctional Officers, Adirondack Correctional Facility, Maher, Correctional Officer,Adirondack Correctional Facility, Harris, Correctional Officer, Coxsackie Correctional Facility and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Ingraham, Correctional Officer, Coxsackie Correctional Facility and Young, Correctional Officer, Coxsackie Correctional Facility
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Bennie Gibson
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
