Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Robinson (PS) v. Colorado Department of Corrections Office of Legal Services et al
as 1:2024cv00988
Plaintiff:
Robert Wayne Robinson
Defendant:
Colorado Department of Corrections Office of Legal Services, Adrienne Sanchez, Celia Swartz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Brady, et al
as 24-1106
Plaintiff:
JABARI J. JOHNSON
Defendant:
JILL BRADY, JENNA KRUSZKA, CATHERINE SHEA and others
Johnson (PS) v. Brady et al
as 1:2024cv00390
Plaintiff:
Jabari Johnson
Defendant:
Jill Brady, Jenna Kruszka, Catherine Shea and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Woo (PS) v. Williams et al
as 1:2023cv03084
Plaintiff:
James Woo
Defendant:
Dean Williams, Moses Stancil, Adrienne Sanchez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wind v. Hartley, et al
as 23-1334
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GREGORY CARL WIND, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
PATSY HARTLEY, RUBERT GALLARDO, TIFFANI HULUBEK and others
Johnson v. Brady et al
as 1:2023cv00692
Plaintiff:
Jabari Johnson
Defendant:
Jill Brady, Catherine Shea, Darren Cantor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. McGrath, et al
as 22-1447
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JABARI J. JOHNSON
Defendant / Appellee:
MERIDETH MCGRATH, MATTHEW WINDEN, HODGES and others
Johnson v. Brady et al
as 1:2022cv03216
Plaintiff:
Jabari J. Johnson
Defendant:
Judge Jill Brady, Jessica Aggson, David Chapin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. McGrath et al
as 1:2022cv03042
Plaintiff:
Jabari Johnson
Defendant:
Merideth McGrath, Matthew Winden, Hodges and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. McGrath et al
as 1:2022cv03019
Plaintiff:
Jabari J. Johnson
Defendant:
Merideth McGrath, Matthew Winden, Hodges and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
