Cases 1 - 7 of 7
ADVANCE MAGAZINE PUBLISHERS INC. v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE et al
as 1:2023cv03463
Plaintiff:
ADVANCE MAGAZINE PUBLISHERS INC.
Defendant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE and U.S. AIR FORCE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 1:2023cv03451
Plaintiff:
ADVANCE MAGAZINE PUBLISHERS INC. and NO PARTY
Defendant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE and U.S. AIR FORCE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
ADVANCE MAGAZINE PUBLISHERS, INC. v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE et al
as 1:2023cv03196
Plaintiff:
ADVANCE MAGAZINE PUBLISHERS, INC.
Defendant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE and U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
ADVANCE MAGAZINE PUBLISHERS INC. v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE et al
as 1:2023cv02445
Plaintiff:
ADVANCE MAGAZINE PUBLISHERS INC.
Defendant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE and U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Inspired Capital, LLC v. Conde Nast
as 19-2057
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Erica Gary, derivatively on behalf of Inspired Food Solutions, LLC and Inspired Capital, LLC
Defendant / Appellee:
Conde Nast, an unincorporated division of Advance Magazine Publishers, Inc., FreemantleMedia North America, Inc., a foreign corporation and FremantleMedia North America, Inc., a foreign corporation
Advance Magazine Publishers, Inc. et al v. John M Wichmann
as 2:2008cv00451
Plaintiff:
Advance Magazine Publishers, Inc., Advance Magazine Publishers, Inc., Advance Magazine Publishers, Inc. and others
Defendant:
John M Wichmann
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Advance Magazine Publishers, Inc. et al v. John M Wichmann
as 2:2007mc00149
Plaintiff:
Advance Magazine Publishers, Inc., Advance Magazine Publishers, Inc., Advance Publications, Inc. and others
Defendant:
John M Wichmann
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
