Cases 1 - 5 of 5
ALAMEDA COUNTY MEDICAL CENTER et al v. BECERRA
as 1:2023cv00690
Plaintiff:
ALAMEDA COUNTY MEDICAL CENTER doing business as HIGHLAND HOSPITAL, COMMUNITY HOSPITAL OF THE MONTEREY PENINSULA, CONTRA COSTA HEALTH SERVICES doing business as CONTRA COSTA REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER and others
Defendant:
XAVIER BECERRA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
ST. JOSEPH HOSPITAL OF ORANGE et al v. AZAR
as 1:2019cv02351
Plaintiff:
CONTRA COSTA HEALTH SERVICES, COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA, SAINT FRANCIS MEDICAL CENTER and others
Defendant:
ALEX M. AZAR, II
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Alameda County Medical Center v. Johnson
as 3:2009cv05062
Plaintiff:
Alameda County Medical Center, Alameda County Medical Center, Alameda County Medical Center and others
Defendant:
Charles E. Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
Alameda County Medical Center, et al v. Kathleen Sebelius, et al
as 09-5119
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Alameda County Medical Center, National Association of Public Hospitals and Health Systems, American Hospital Association and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Kathleen Sebelius, in her official capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of Health and Human Services, Charles E. Johnson, in his official capacity as Acting Secretary of the United States Department of Health and Human Services, Charlene Frizzera, in her official capacity as Acting Administrator of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services and others
ALAMEDA COUNTY MEDICAL CENTER et al v. LEAVITT et al
as 1:2008cv00422
Plaintiff:
ALAMEDA COUNTY MEDICAL CENTER, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF PUBLIC HOSPITALS AND HEALTH SYSTEMS, AMERICAN HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION and others
Defendant:
MICHAEL O. LEAVITT, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, KERRY WEEMS and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
