Cases 101 - 110 of 110
NEVAREZ v. GONZALES et al
as 1:2007cv00226
Petitioner:
ARNOLD NEVAREZ
Respondent:
ALBERTO GONZALES and HARLEY G. LAPPIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
DOYE v. GONZALES
as 1:2007cv00211
Plaintiff:
IRVIN S. DOYE
Defendant:
ALBERTO GONZALES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CAMP v. GONZALES et al
as 1:2007cv00224
Petitioner:
WILLIAM PHILIP CAMP, JR.
Respondent:
ALBERTO GONZALES and HARLEY G. LAPPIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
PEREZ v. GONZALES et al
as 1:2007cv00159
Petitioner:
LAZARO F. PEREZ, SR.
Respondent:
ALBERTO GONZALES and HARLEY G. LAPPIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
VALENZUELA v. GONZALES et al
as 1:2007cv00134
Petitioner:
BENNIE VALENZUELA, JR.
Respondent:
ALBERTO GONZALES and HARLEY G. LAPPIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
WILLIAMS v. GONZALES et al
as 1:2007cv00114
Petitioner:
WARNER DOUGLAS WILLIAMS
Respondent:
ALBERTO GONZALES and HARLEY G. LAPPIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
MARTINEZ v. GONZALES et al
as 1:2007cv00112
Petitioner:
BENITO VICTOR MARTINEZ
Respondent:
ALBERTO GONZALES and HARLEY G. LAPPIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
LOVE v. GONZALES et al
as 1:2007cv00068
Petitioner:
KELVIN LOVE
Respondent:
ALBERTO GONZALES and HARLEY G. LAPPIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
BANKS v. UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
as 1:2007cv00021
Petitioner:
TRAVIS BANKS
Defendant:
ALBERTO GONZALES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv00010
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
