Cases 1 - 10 of 19
James Neuman v. United States Government
as 08-5535
Plaintiff - Appellant:
James Neuman
Defendant - Appellee:
United States Government, United States Department of Justice, Department of Coordination and Review for the Department of Justice and others
Betty Newby v. George Bush
as 08-5469
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Betty Ann Newby
Defendant - Appellee:
George W. Bush, George H.W. Bush, Jenna Bush Hager and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 08-5111
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appointed Amicus Curiae For Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
ADDAMS-MORE v. GONZALES et al
as 1:2007cv02022
Plaintiff:
MARTI ADDAMS-MORE
Defendant:
ALBERTO R. GONZALES, U.S. JUSTICE DEPARTMENT, CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv01559
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
MIDDLESEX COUNTY, VIRGINIA v. GONZALES et al
as 1:2007cv01485
Plaintiff:
MIDDLESEX COUNTY, VIRGINIA
Defendant:
ALBERTO R. GONZALES and WAN J. KIM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1471 Declaratory & Injunctive Relief - Foreclo
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 07-5139
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv00758
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv00225
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
RUIZ RIVERA v. GONZALES et al
as 1:2007cv00019
Plaintiff:
ANGEL RUIZ RIVERA
Defendant:
ALBERTO R. GONZALES, U.S. ATTORNEY, H. MARSHALL JARRETT and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
