Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Haas v. Alcatel-Lucent
as 1:2015cv02486
Plaintiff:
Marilyn Haas
Defendant:
Alcatel-Lucent USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Fiber, LLC v. Alcatel-Lucent USA Inc.
as 1:2015cv02135
Plaintiff:
Fiber, LLC
Defendant:
Alcatel-Lucent USA Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
High Point Sarl v. Sprint Nextel Corporation, et al
as 15-3017
Plaintiff Counterclaim Defendant - Appellant:
HIGH POINT SARL
Defendant Counterclaimant - Appellee:
SPRINT NEXTEL CORPORATION, SPRINT SPECTRUM, L.P., SPRINTCOM, INC. and others
Not A Party In Lower Court:
ERICSSON INC.
:
Tran v. Lucent Technologies Inc Pension Plan et al
as 5:2014cv00865
Plaintiff:
Soi T Tran
Defendant:
Lucent Technologies Inc Pension Plan, Lucent Technologies Inc Pension Plan Trust Fund, Bank of New York Mellon Trustee of Lucent Technologies Inc Pension Plan Trust Fund and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Pine Telephone, et al v. Alcatel-Lucent
as 14-7012
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PINE TELEPHONE COMPANY, INC., an Oklahoma corporation and PINE CELLULAR PHONES, INC., an Oklahoma corporation
Defendant - Appellee:
ALCATEL-LUCENT USA, INC., a Delaware corporation, FKA Alcatel USA Marketing, Inc.
Pine Telephone Company v. Alcatel-Lucent USA, Inc.
as 11-7080
Plaintiff-Counter-Claim-Defendant - Appellee:
PINE TELEPHONE COMPANY, INC., an Oklahoma corporation
Defendant-Counter-Claimant - Appellant:
ALCATEL-LUCENT USA, INC., a Delaware corporation, FKA Alcatel USA Marketing, Inc.
Pine Telephone Company v. Alcatel-Lucent USA Inc.
as 6:2011cv00353
Plaintiff:
Pine Telephone Company
Defendant:
Alcatel-Lucent USA Inc.
Counter_claimant:
Alcatel-Lucent USA Inc.
Counter_defendant:
Pine Telephone Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Ciena Communications, Inc. v. Nachazel et al
as 1:2009cv02845
Plaintiff:
Ciena Communications, Inc.
Defendant:
James J. Nachazel and Alcatel-Lucent USA Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
