Cases filed in New York
Cases 11 - 20 of 24
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv07486
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant and others
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Planned Parenthood Federation of America, Inc. et al v. Azar II et al
as 1:2019cv05433
Plaintiff: Planned Parenthood Federation of America, Inc., Planned Parenthood of Northern New England, Inc.
Defendant: Office for Civil Rights, Roger Severino, Alex M. Azar II and others
Amicus Curiae: the North American Society for Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology, the American College of Osteopathic Obstetricians and Gynecologists, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists and others
Cause Of Action: Administrative Procedure Act
National Family Planning and Reproductive Health Association et al v. Azar et al
as 1:2019cv05435
Plaintiff: National Family Planning and Reproductive Health Association, Public Health Solutions, Inc.
Defendant: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Alex M. Azar, II, Roger Severino and others
Amicus Curiae: the American Muslim Health Professionals, Institute for Policy Integrity, The American Medical Association and others
Interested Party: Planned Parenthood of Northern New England, Inc., Planned Parenthood Federation of America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Administrative Procedure Act
State of New York et al v. United States Department of Health and Human Services et al Featured Case We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2019cv04676
Plaintiff: STATE OF NEVADA, STATE OF MARYLAND, STATE OF CONNECTICUT and others
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, ALEX M. AZAR II
Consolidated Plaintiff: Public Health Solutions, Inc., Planned Parenthood of Northern New England, Inc., Planned Parenthood Federation of America, Inc. and others
Amicus Curiae: Institute for Policy Integrity, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, the American College of Osteopathic Obstetricians and Gynecologists and others
Intervenor Defendant: Dr. Regina Renee Frost, Christian Medical and Dental Associations
Consolidated Defendant: Roger Severino, Office for Civil Rights, Office for Civil Rights of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
Cause Of Action: Administrative Procedure Act
Seife et al v. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2018cv11462
Defendant: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Alex M. Azar, II, Francis S. Collins and others
Plaintiff: Peter Lurie, Charles Seife
Cause Of Action: Administrative Procedure Act
D.J.C.V. et al v. U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement et al
as 1:2018cv09115
Respondent: Anthony Mele, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Director Thomas Decker and others
Petitioner: D.J.C.V., a minor, Mr. C, D.J.C.V
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv06791
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant and others
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant and others
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
E.S.R.B. et al v. Sessions III et al
as 1:2018cv06654
Defendant: U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Ronald D. Vitiello, Department Of Homeland Security and others
Plaintiff: J.E.C.M., K.C.A., F.E.O.G. and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Defendant
N.T.C. et al v. U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2018cv06428
Defendant: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Alex Azar, Ronald Vitiello and others
Plaintiff: H.M.C., N.T.C.
Cause Of Action: Immigration & Nationality Act (Definitions)
Savage et al v. Azar,III
as 1:2018mc00264
Plaintiff: Michael Savage, Lee Barrows, George Renshaw and others
Intervenor_plaintiff: Loretta Jackson, Christina Alexander, Mary Smith and others
Defendant: Alex M Azar,III
Cause Of Action: M 08-85 Motion to Quash

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?