Cases 71 - 80 of 358
EMANATE HEALTH MEDICAL CENTER et al v. AZAR
as 1:2020cv01811
Plaintiff:
EMANATE HEALTH FOOTHILL PRESBYTERIAN HOSPITAL, EMANATE HEALTH MEDICAL CENTER, EMANATE HEALTH MEDICAL CENTER doing business as EMANATE HEALTH INTER-COMMUNITY HOSPITAL doing business as EMANATE HEALTH QUEEN OF THE VALLEY HOSPITAL formerly known as CITRUS VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER doing business as INTER-COMMUNITY CAMPUS AND QUEEN OF and others
Defendant:
ALEX M. AZAR, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv02032
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
MISCHLER v. PENCE et al
as 1:2020cv01863
Defendant:
ALEX AZAR, SHANE BAUMGARDNER, KELLY CRAFT and others
Plaintiff:
AMY MISCHLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 1:2020cv02034
Defendant:
ALEX M. AZAR, II, RODNEY S. SCOTT, MATTHEW T. ALBENCE and others
Plaintiff:
TEXAS CIVIL RIGHTS PROJECT and NO PARTY
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1101
VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER v. AZAR
as 1:2020cv01582
Defendant:
ALEX M. AZAR, II
Plaintiff:
VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395
WHEELER v. AZAR
as 1:2020cv01287
Defendant:
ALEX M. AZAR, II
Plaintiff:
KENARD WHEELER, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
CHRISTUS GOOD SHEPHERD MEDICAL CENTER LONGVIEW et al v. AZAR II
as 1:2020cv01413
Plaintiff:
SKOKIE HOSPITAL, CHRISTUS GOOD SHEPHERD MEDICAL CENTER - MARSHALL, EVANSTON HOSPITAL and others
Defendant:
ALEX M. AZAR II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
SOUTH CENTRAL REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER v. AZAR
as 1:2020cv01140
Defendant:
ALEX M. AZAR, II
Plaintiff:
SOUTH CENTRAL REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv01670
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
HENRY et al v. AZAR
as 1:2020cv01144
Defendant:
ALEX M. AZAR, II
Plaintiff:
ALCRESTA THERAPEUTICS, INC. and JAMES HENRY
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
