Cases 1 - 10 of 51
Alexander Bebris v. National Center for Missing and Exploited Children
as 24-5067
Plaintiff:
Alexander P. Bebris
Defendant:
National Center for Missing and Exploited Children, also known as NCMEC
David Rudometkin, et al v. Lloyd Austin, III
as 23-5218
Plaintiff / Appellee:
David J. Rudometkin, Corry P. Brooks and Robert L. Barnett, III, and others similarly situated
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Alexander L. Driskill
Defendant / Appellee:
Lloyd J. Austin, III, in his capacity as the Secretary of Defense
WILLIAMS v. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al
as 1:2023cv00401
Plaintiff:
ALEXANDER WILLIAMS, JR.
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, UNITED STATES MARSHAL SERVICES and CHARLOTTE LUCKSTONE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
WILLIAMS v. U.S. MARSHALS SERVICE et al
as 1:2023cv00346
Plaintiff:
ALEXANDER WILLIAMS, JR.
Defendant:
U.S. MARSHALS SERVICE and CHARLOTTE LUCKSTONE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
BALLARD v. UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT
as 1:2022cv02239
Plaintiff:
ALEXANDER BALLARD
Defendant:
UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00210
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
EVANS v. MACBEAN
as 1:2021cv01749
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH EVANS
Defendant:
ALEXANDER MACBEAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ALEXANDER v. CARVAJAL et al
as 1:2020cv01897
Plaintiff:
MORRIS ALEXANDER
Defendant:
MICHAEL CARVAJAL, UNITED STATES FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, JESSE BELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MAJETT v. USA
as 1:2020cv01685
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
ALEXANDER MAJETT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
FELIZ v. PARK et al
as 1:2019cv03861
Defendant:
ABRAHAM CLOTT, JUNG PARK, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK and others
Plaintiff:
ALEXANDER FELIZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
