Cases 21 - 30 of 48
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2008cv00333
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2008cv00272
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Application for Naturalization
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2008cv00126
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Review of denial of an application for naturalization
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2008cv00127
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2008cv00024
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Liu v. Chertoff et al
as 5:2007cv06017
Plaintiff:
Yu Liu
Defendant:
Michael Chertoff, Michael B. Mukasey, Emilio T. Gonzalez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Hussain v. Chertoff et al
as 3:2007cv05439
Plaintiff:
Adeela Hussain
Defendant:
Michael Chertoff, Peter D. Keisler, Emilio T. Gonzalez and others
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
Johnson v. Chertoff et al
as 2:2007at00908
Petitioner:
Chong Hwa Johnson
Defendant:
Michael Chertoff, Peter Keisler, Robert S. Mueller, III and others
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
Johnson v. Chertoff et al
as 2:2007cv02054
Plaintiff:
Chong Hwa Johnson
Defendant:
Michael Chertoff, Peter Keisler, Robert S. Mueller, III and others
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
Miriam Tepper v. Alberto Gonzales et al
as 2:2007cv05827
Plaintiff:
Miriam Tepper
Defendant:
Alberto Gonzales, Michael Chertoff, Emilio T Gonzalez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
