Cases 1 - 7 of 7
GUAM SOCIETY OF OBSTETRICIANS AND GYNECOLOGISTS, et al v. Douglas Moylan, et al
as 23-15602
Plaintiff / Appellee:
GUAM SOCIETY OF OBSTETRICIANS AND GYNECOLOGISTS, GUAM NURSES ASSOCIATION, MILTON H. COLE, Jr., Reverend and others
Defendant / Appellant:
DOUGLAS B. MOYLAN, in his official capacity as Attorney General of Guam
Defendant / Appellee:
LOURDES LEON GUERRERO, in her official capacity as Governor of Guam, ARTHUR U. SAN AGUSTIN, MHR, in his official capacity as Director of the Department of Public Health and Social Services, LILLIAN PEREZ-POSADAS, M.N., R.N., in her official capacity as Administrator of the Guam Memorial Hospital and others
Sedfrey Linsangan v. Alice Taijeron, et al
as 20-15103
Defendant / Appellee:
BENNY A. PINAULA, JAIDEEN L. TUNCAP, JOAQUIN P. PEREZ and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SEDFREY M. LINSANGAN
Arnold Davis v. Guam, et al
as 17-15719
Plaintiff - Appellee:
ARNOLD DAVIS, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated
Defendant - Appellant:
GUAM, GUAM ELECTION COMMISSION, ALICE M. TAIJERON and others
Howard Trapp v. Election Commission, et al
as 14-17062
Petitioner - Appellant:
HOWARD GUSTAF TRAPP
Respondent - Appellee:
ELECTION COMMISSION, JOSEPH F. MESA, ALICE M. TAIJERON and others
Trapp v. Election Commission et al
as 1:2014cv00015
Petitioner:
Howard Trapp
Respondent:
Election Commission , Joseph F. Mesa , Alice M. Taijeron and others
Cause Of Action: 48 U.S.C. § 1424
Arnold Davis v. Guam, et al
as 13-15199
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ARNOLD DAVIS, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated
Defendant - Appellee:
GUAM, GUAM ELECTION COMMISSION, ALICE M. TAIJERON and others
Davis v. Guam et al
as 1:2011cv00035
Plaintiff:
Arnold Davis
Defendant:
Guam , Guam Election Commission, Alice M. Taijeron and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
