Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv06275
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
In Re: Clearview AI, Inc., Consumer Privacy Litigation
as 1:2021cv00135
Plaintiff:
John McPherson, Rosemary Arias, Sean Burke and others
Defendant:
Wynndalco Enterprises, LLC, Hoan Ton-That, Jose Flores and others
In Re:
Clearview AI, Inc., Consumer Privacy Litigation
Amicus Curiae:
Duke Law First Amendment Clinic, Professor Eugene Volokh, Professor Jane Bambauer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
In Re: TikTok, Inc., Consumer Privacy Litigation
as 1:2020cv04699
In Re:
TikTok, Inc., Consumer Privacy Litigation
Plaintiff:
Aparna Iyer, M.P., a minor, by and through her guardian, Requeenis Gilder, N.D. Cal. Actions Interim Lead Counsel and others
Defendant:
BEIJING BYTEDANCE TECHNOLOGY CO. LTD, MUSICAL.LY, TikTok Inc. and others
Petitioner:
Meghan Smith, Loevy & Loevy, Edelson PC and others
Michael's Grain Farm, Inc. et al v. Syngenta AG et al
as 3:2017cv00320
Defendant:
Syngenta AG, Syngenta Crop Protection AG, Syngenta Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Michael's Grain Farm, Inc, Michael's Grain Farm, Inc., Fred Timothy Donaldson, Jr and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
In re: Just for Men Mass Tort Litigation
as 3:2016cv00638
Plaintiff:
--All Plaintiffs re Just for Men Cases
Defendant:
Combe Incorporated , Combe Products, Inc. , Combe Laboratories, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
In Re: Opana ER Antitrust Litigation
as 1:2014cv10150
In Re:
Opana ER Antitrust Litigation
Plaintiff:
Rochester Drug Co-Operative, Inc., Value Drug Company, Kim Mahaffay and others
Defendant:
Impax Laboratories, Inc., Endo Health Solutions Inc., Endo Pharmaceuticals Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
