Cases 41 - 50 of 55
Meloni et al v. Wainstein et al
as 1:2013cv08439
Plaintiff:
Fermo Meloni , Morena Almeida , Jonathan Franco and others
Defendant:
Michael Wainstein, Derek Koch, Daniel Koch and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Almeida v. Rapid Armored Corporation et al
as 2:2013cv05785
Plaintiff:
David Almeida
Defendant:
John and Jane Does 2:13cv5785 nos. 1-10, Robin Miles and Rapid Armored Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Almeida v. Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
as 7:2013cv02577
Plaintiff:
Nicole Almeida
Defendant:
Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Santiago v. New York City et al
as 1:2013cv01643
Defendant:
Police Officer Derek Almeida, New York City, Police Officer Kelvin Perez and others
Plaintiff:
Steven Santiago
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv06133
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Almeida v. Pratt et al
as 1:2012cv06570
Plaintiff:
Bernardo Almeida
Defendant:
Charles Arthur Pratt, III and Blanche L. Pratt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2012cv01119
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Almeida v. Ammos Estiatorio NYC et al
as 1:2011cv08812
Plaintiff:
Rafael Almeida
Defendant:
Ammos Estiatorio NYC and Dimitris Nakos
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
De Almeida et al v. Fastway Moving & Storage Inc.
as 1:2010cv08859
Plaintiff:
Paulo De Almeida and Izabel Orlatei
Defendant:
Fastway Moving & Storage Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv01493
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
