Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Sanders v. Sundquist et al
as 3:2026cv01859
Plaintiff: Antonio Larenzo Sanders
Defendant: Amber Sundquist and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hawkins v. State of Oregon et al
as 3:2026cv01759
Plaintiff: Thomas N. Hawkins
Defendant: State of Oregon, Ms. Caples and Amber Sundquist
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Louche v. Sundquist
as 3:2026cv01715
Petitioner: Michael Raymond Louche
Respondent: Amber Sundquist
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kicinski v. State of Oregon et al
as 3:2026cv01448
Plaintiff: Charles Murry Kicinski
Defendant: State of Oregon, Amber Sundquist and Dr. Joanne Boisvert
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Godstone v. Stephen et al
as 3:2026cv01257
Plaintiff: Merlin Godstone
Defendant: Brian Stephen, Gary Ninman, Daryl Borello and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hamman v. Sundquist
as 26-3019
Petitioner: DWIGHT LEE HAMMAN
Respondent: AMBER SUNDQUIST
White v. Sundquist et al
as 3:2026cv00543
Plaintiff: Daniel David White
Defendant: Amber Sundquist, Josh Bebee, Teresa Plummer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
White v. Sundquist et al
as 1:2026cv00543
Plaintiff: Daniel David White
Defendant: Amber Sundquist and Superintendant of Deer Ridge Correctional Institution (DRCI)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clinton v. Sundquist, et al.
as 3:2026cv00389
Plaintiff: Rebel Xavier Clinton
Defendant: Supt. Amber Sundquist, Asst. Supt. Teresa Plummer, Sgt. Dustin Ferguson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Schwab v. Beamer et al
as 3:2026cv00074
Plaintiff: Joseph Schwab
Defendant: Leland Beamer, Oregon Department of Corrections, Warren Roberts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?