Cases 1 - 10 of 760
David Thompson v. Crane Company, et al
as 12-80135
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
DAVID THOMPSON
Defendant - Respondent:
CRANE COMPANY, Delaware corporation, AURORA PUMP COMPANY, a foreign corporation, BAYER CROPSCIENCE, INC., successor-in-interest to Rhone-Poulenc AG Company, a foreign company, FKA Amchem Products, Inc., FKA Benjamin Foster Products Company and others
Douglas Leite, et al v. Crane Company, et al
as 12-80124
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
DOUGLAS P. LEITE and MARY ANN K. LEITE
Defendant - Respondent:
CRANE COMPANY, a Delaware corporation, AURORA PUMP COMPANY, a foreign corporation, BAYER CROPSCIENCE, INC., successor-in-interest to Rhone-Poulenc AG Company, a foreign company, AKA Amchem Products, Inc., AKA Benjamin Foster Products Company and others
Saffold v. Giles et al (INMATE1)
as 1:2007cv00598
Defendant:
Acands Inc., Amchem Products Inc., Armstrong World Indu. Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Nelson B. Bowman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Charles King v. Amchem Products, Inc., et al.
as VAE/4:09-CV-03268
Defendant:
Amchem Products, Inc
Plaintiff:
Charles King
Lora Jeanette Goss, et al. v. Amchem Products, Inc., et al.
as PAE/2:09-CV-81617
Defendant:
Amchem Products, Inc
Plaintiff:
Lora Jeanette Goss
Edna Hatley, et al. v. Amchem Products, Inc., et al.
as PAE/2:09-CV-81621
Defendant:
Amchem Products, Inc
Plaintiff:
Edna Hatley
Betty Taylor, et al. v. Amchem Products, Inc., et al.
as PAE/2:09-CV-81540
Plaintiff:
Betty Taylor
Defendant:
Amchem Products, Inc
Yusuf Mahdee, et al. v. Amchem Products, Inc., et al.
as PAE/2:09-CV-81494
Defendant:
Amchem Products, Inc
Plaintiff:
Yusuf Mahdee
Wallace Allen Davison, et al. v. Amchem Products, Inc., et al.
as PAE/2:09-CV-81554
Plaintiff:
Wallace Allen Davison
Defendant:
Amchem Products, Inc
Curley Edmond Ford v. Amchem Products, Inc., et al.
as PAE/2:09-CV-81611
Defendant:
Amchem Products, Inc
Plaintiff:
Curley Edmond Ford
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
