Cases 1 - 4 of 4
Munich Reinsurance Company UK v. AMR Corporation
as 10-3139
Plaintiff:
Munich Reinsurance Company UK General Branch and Muenchener Rueckversicherungs-Gesellschaft, as Subrogees of Silverstein Development, et al
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Intervenors The WTC Plaintiffs
Defendant - Appellee:
AMR Corporation, a Delaware Corporation, American Airlines, Incorporated, a Delaware Corporation, UAL Corporation, a Delaware Corporation and others
Certain Underwriters v. AMR Corporation
as 10-3133
Plaintiff:
Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's Comprising Syndicates No. 33,1003,2003,1208,1243,0376, Individually and collectively as Subrogees of Silverstein Properties. Inc. and Great Lakes Reinsurance (UK) PLC, Individually and Collectively as Subrogees of Silverstein Properties, Inc.
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Intervenors The WTC Plaintiffs
Defendant:
City of Portland, Maine, a governmental entity, organized under the laws of the State of Maine
Defendant - Appellee:
AMR Corporation, a Delaware Corporation, American Airlines, Incorporated, a Delaware Corporation, UAL Corporation, a Delaware Corporation and others
Woburn Insurance, Ltd. v. AMR Corporation
as 10-3141
Plaintiff:
Woburn Insurance, Ltd.
Defendant - Appellee:
AMR Corporation, a Delaware corporation, American Airlines, Incorporated, a Delaware corporation, UAL Corporation, a Delaware corporation and others
Intervenor - Appellant:
Intervenors The WTC Plaintiffs
American Alternative Insurance v. AMR Corporation
as 10-3143
Plaintiff:
American Alternative Insurance Corporation, Great Lakes Reinsurance (UK) PLC and The Princeton Excess & Surplus Lines Insurance Company
Defendant - Appellee:
AMR Corporation, a Delaware Corporation, American Airlines, Incorporated, a Delaware Corporation, United Airlines Incorporated, a Delaware Corporation and others
Intervenor - Appellant:
Intervenors The WTC Plaintiffs
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
