Cases 41 - 49 of 49
The American Civil Liberties U, et al v. Catherine Masto, et al
as 09-16008
Plaintiff - Appellee:
THE AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF NEVADA and DOES 1-8, and Does A-S
Defendant - Appellant:
CATHERINE CORTEZ MASTO, Attorney General of the State of Nevada, GERALD HAFEN, Director of the Nevada Department of Public Safety, BERNARD W. CURTIS, Chief, Parole and Probation Division of the Nevada Department of Public Safety and others
Defendant:
MICHAEL HALEY, Sheriff of the Washoe County Sheriff's Office, MICHAEL POEHLMAN, Chief of the Reno Police Department, RICHARD GAMMICK, District Attorney of Washoe County and others
Jerry Valdivia, et al v. Arnold Schwarzenegger
as 09-15836
Plaintiff - Appellee:
JERRY VALDIVIA, ALFRED YANCY and HOSSIE WELCH, on their own behalf and on behalf of the class of all persons similarly situated
Defendant - Appellant:
ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, Governor, State of California
Amicus Curiae - Pending:
THE AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA THE JUSTICE POLICY INSTITUTE LEGAL SERVICES FOR PRISONERS AND CHILDERN THE NATIONAL COUNCIL ON CRIME AND DELINQUENCY THE SENTENCING PROJECT
The American Civil Liberties U, et al v. Catherine Masto, et al
as 08-17471
Plaintiff - Appellee:
THE AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF NEVADA and DOES 1-8, and Does A-S
Defendant - Appellant:
CATHERINE CORTEZ MASTO, Attorney General of the State of Nevada, GERALD HAFEN, Director of the Nevada Department of Public Safety, BERNARD W. CURTIS, Chief, Parole and Probation Division of the Nevada Department of Public Safety and others
Defendant:
MICHAEL HALEY, Sheriff of the Washoe County Sheriff's Office, MICHAEL POEHLMAN, Chief of the Reno Police Department, RICHARD GAMMICK, District Attorney of Washoe County and others
Marijuana Policy Project, et al v. Nevada Resort Association, et al
as 08-17429
Plaintiff - Appellee:
MARIJUANA POLICY PROJECT, COMMITTE TO REGULATE AND CONTROL MARIJUANA, AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF NEVADA and others
Defendant:
ROSS MILLER
Defendant-intervenor - Appellant:
NEVADA RESORT ASSOCIATION
Plaintiff-intervenor:
WE THE PEOPLE NEVADA
Marijuana Policy Project et al v. Miller
as 2:2008cv00199
Plaintiff:
Marijuana Policy Project, Marijuana Policy Project, Marijuana Policy Project and others
Defendant:
Ross Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question
Mayfield, et al v. USA, et al
as 07-35865
Plaintiff - Appellee:
BRANDON B. MAYFIELD, an individual, MONA MAYFIELD, appointed ad Guardian Ad Litem per Order, SHANE MAYFIELD and others
Defendant - Appellant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Amicus Curiae:
GARRETT EPPS, Esquire, ERWIN CHEMERINSKY, Esquire, ROBERT S. PECK, Esquire and others
Berger v. City of Seattle, et al
as 05-35752
Plaintiff - Appellee:
MICHAEL JAMES BERGER, a single man also known as Magic Mike
Defendant - Appellant:
CITY OF SEATTLE, VIRGINIA ANDERSON, Director of Seattle Center, MICHAEL B. ANDERSON, Emergency Service Manager for Seattle Center and others
Amicus - Amicus Curiae:
AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION
Fair Housing Council, et al v. Roommates.com, LLC
as 04-56916
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FAIR HOUSING COUNCIL OF SAN FERNANDO VALLEY and THE FAIR HOUSING COUNCIL OF SAN DIEGO, individually and on behalf of the GENERAL PUBLIC
Defendant - Appellee:
ROOMMATES.COM, LLC
Amicus - Amicus Curiae:
AMAZON.COM, INC.; AMERICA ONLINE, INC.; EBAY INC.; GOOGLE INC.; TRIBUNE COMPANY; YAHOO! INC.; NETCHOICE; UNITED STATES INTERNET SERVICE PROVIDER ASSOCIATION
Amicus Curiae:
NEWS ORGANIZATIONS and AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA
Truth, et al v. Kent School District, et al
as 04-35876
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TRUTH, an unincorporated association, SARICE UNDIS, a minor, by and through her father, LARRY UNDIS and JULIANNE STEWART, a minor, by and through her parents, PAUL and ANNA STEWART
Defendant - Appellee:
KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT, BARBARA GROHE, Superintendent of Kent School District, MIKE ALBRECHT, Principal of Kentridge High School and others
Amicus Curiae:
AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF WASHINGTON
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
