Cases 1 - 7 of 7
John Doe #1, et al v. American Federation of Government Employees, et al
as 23-7067
Plaintiff / Appellee:
John Doe #1, and others similarly situated, Annette Wells, and other AFGE members similarly situated, Paul Vaughan and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Jocelynn Johnson, Salim Javed, Waqas Kalyar and others
Defendant / Appellee:
American Federation of Government Employees, ("AFGE"), Jeffrey David Cox, Sr., in his official and personal capacity, Everett Kelley, in his official and personal capacity and others
Nia Lucas v. American Federation of Government Employees, et al
as 23-7054
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Nia Lucas
Defendant / Appellee:
American Federation of Government Employees, (AFGE), AFGE Local 228, Johnnie D. Green, Individual and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-7051
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
DOE #1 et al v. AMERICAN FEDERATION OF GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES et al
as 1:2020cv01558
Defendant:
Arnold Scott, Gerald Swanke, George McCubbin and others
Not Classified By Court:
John Doe #1 et al. and John and Jane Does AFGE Officers, Employees and Agents
Plaintiff:
VALYRIA LEWIS, ANNETTE WELLS, WAQAS KALYAR and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 754
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-2418
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Verla Wiley v. Jeffrey Shell
as 13-5310
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Verla Wiley, AMERICAN FEDERATION OF GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES (AFGE) Local 1812, General Vice President ; in her Individual & Official Capacities
Defendant - Appellee:
Jeffrey Shell, Chairman Broadcasting Board of Governors, An Agency of the United States
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2009cv01406
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
