Cases 1 - 8 of 8
LEWARK v. AMC MORTGAGE SERVICES et al
as 2:2008cv00210
Plaintiff:
DANETE M. LEWARK
Defendant:
AMC MORTGAGE SERVICES and AMERIQUEST MORTGAGE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Breach of Contract
TAYLOR v. AMERIQUEST MORTGAGE COMPANY et al
as 2:2008cv00431
Plaintiff:
BETTY TAYLOR
Defendant:
AMERIQUEST MORTGAGE COMPANY and DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST CO. AS TRUSTEE OF AMERIQUEST MORTGAGE SECURITIES INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1640 Truth in Lending
GARNER v. AMERIQUEST MORTGAGE COMPANY et al
as 2:2007cv05079
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL GARNER
Defendant:
AMERIQUEST MORTGAGE COMPANY and DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST CO.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1640 Truth in Lending
POZIVIAK v. AMC MORTGAGE SERVICES et al
as 2:2007cv00784
Plaintiff:
PHYLLIS POZIVIAK
Defendant:
AMC MORTGAGE SERVICES, AMERIQUEST MORTGAGE COMPANY and NATIONS TITLE AGENCY OF MARYLAND
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv01863
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv01396
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158 Notice of Appeal re Bankruptcy Matter (BA
JEFFERIES v. AMERIQUEST MORTGAGE COMPANY
as 2:2007cv00557
Plaintiff:
NADIRAH J. JEFFERIES and NADIRAH J. JEFFERIES
Defendant:
AMERIQUEST MORTGAGE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
FIRST MERIT SETTLEMENT SERVICES, INC. v. AMERIQUEST MORTGAGE COMPANY
as 2:2007cv00135
Plaintiff:
FIRST MERIT SETTLEMENT SERVICES, INC.
Defendant:
AMERIQUEST MORTGAGE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
